Skip to content
La Verkin, Utah eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,476 residents

La Verkin, UT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Washington County · Population 4,476

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

85th percentile, Utah.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average1.9 Now2.3
2.3 1.6 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 1.8 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.0 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.7 1993 · score 1.6 1994 · score 1.6 1995 · score 1.6 1996 · score 1.6 1997 · score 1.6 1998 · score 1.6 1999 · score 1.7 2000 · score 1.6 2001 · score 1.7 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.7 2004 · score 1.7 2005 · score 1.7 2006 · score 1.6 2007 · score 1.6 2008 · score 1.7 2009 · score 2.0 2010 · score 2.1 2011 · score 2.0 2012 · score 1.8 2013 · score 1.7 2014 · score 1.7 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 2.0 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.1 2020 · score 2.3 2021 · score 2.2 2022 · score 2.1 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.2 Regional 3.2 State 1.9 Economic 7.5 Supply 6.5 Rent Control 7.8 Eviction 1.4 Tenant 5.2 Housing 8.3 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +52.3% (2024)
    3.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.2
  3. State political climate
    Utah legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    25.4% poverty · 4.6% unemp.
    7.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,392 average · 23.8% renters
    6.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.5% of income on rent
    7.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    1.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    23.8% renters
    5.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    8.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across La Verkin and the region

Click any city to see its score

How La Verkin compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Washington County
High
#5 of 20 cities
Rank in county, 79th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 20 cities in Washington County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Utah
High
#64 of 333 cities
Rank in state, 81st percentileLowHigh
#64 of 333 cities in Utah for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
La Verkin risk score vs. county / state / U.S.La Verkin: 2.32.3La VerkinThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,392/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $917–$2,996 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 23.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,476 residents, 23.8% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 25.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.2 and 3.2 (GOP margin +52.3% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.4, housing court bias 8.3, rent-control risk 7.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.5. Supply constraint: 6.5. The numbers behind those: 25.4% poverty, 4.6% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

La Verkin sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) St. George, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 St. George Salt Lake City, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.9 Salt Lake City West Valley City, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.6 West Valley City West Jordan, UT · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.3 West Jordan Provo, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.2 Provo Orem, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 Orem Sandy, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Sandy Ogden, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7 Ogden Lehi, UT · 24d · ~$2.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.2 Lehi Layton, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.1 Layton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle La Verkin
La Verkin · 24d · ~$2.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in La Verkin, UT

Landlording in La Verkin, Utah, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

La Verkin is a city of 4,476 residents where 23.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,392/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How La Verkin eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in La Verkin closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of La Verkin's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 8.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in La Verkin runs $917 to $2,996 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $1,392/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.2/10 in La Verkin, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Utah, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in La Verkin: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Utah's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,996 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in La Verkin

Trap · 23.8%
23.8% renter share against 4,476 residents produces roughly 1,067 rental occupants in La Verkin. Washington County voted R 51.7% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just disappears?

If your tenant abandons the property, Utah law requires you to follow specific procedures for determining abandonment and handling their personal property. You can't just assume it's abandoned. Typically, you'll need to post a notice and wait a certain number of days before taking possession. Consult with an attorney to ensure you don't accidentally violate tenant rights and face liability.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for breaking rules not covered in the lease?

Generally, no. Your lease is your contract. If a rule isn't in the lease, it's very difficult to enforce through an eviction. This is why a comprehensive and clearly written lease is so important. Make sure all your house rules are explicitly stated and agreed upon.
Q3

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase in La Verkin?

For month-to-month tenancies, you typically need to give at least 15 days' written notice for a rent increase, unless your lease specifies a longer period. For fixed-term leases, you cannot increase rent until the lease term ends, unless the lease itself allows for it. Always provide written notice.
Q4

What if the tenant claims the property has maintenance issues as a reason for not paying rent?

In Utah, tenants generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues without going through a specific legal process. They must give you written notice of the defect and a reasonable time to repair it. If you fail to repair, they may have options, but simply withholding rent is usually not allowed. This is often a tactic to delay eviction. Address legitimate maintenance issues promptly, but don't let it derail your eviction process if rent is truly unpaid. For more on this, see our Utah tenant protections guide.
Q5

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction?

While you can represent yourself in Utah small claims court, having an attorney is highly recommended, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or you're unsure about the legal steps. An attorney can save you time, money, and stress by ensuring the process is handled correctly and efficiently, minimizing delays and potential errors.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places La Verkin in the 85th percentile of Utah cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.