Skip to content
Neighborhood · Chesapeake, VA

Chadswyck Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 3,413 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10 · range 3–3

Chadswyck maps to a single census tract in Chesapeake, VA and houses 3,413 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3/10, placing it in the Lower tier. The severe-burden share is 62%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Cost burden runs 62% against 33.8% citywide, putting Chadswyck 28.4% over its own city. Average gross rent is $2,191, 38% above the Chesapeake average of $1,586.

The voucher gap is 29.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure, at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint is economic stress, at 1.9/10.

On the high side is supply constraint at 7.9/10. SNAP participation is 6.6% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity affects 8.7% of adults, 9.1 points below the national rate. That places it #29 of 48 neighborhoods in Chesapeake. At 10% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.

For a like-for-like read, Forest Hills and Cornland score within a fraction of it. Against average income of $137,972, annual rent is only 19%, a wide affordability cushion.

One tract means one number: 3/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Chadswyck vs Chesapeake How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
62.2% +84%
Chesapeake: 33.8%
Average gross rent
$2,191 +38%
Chesapeake: $1,586
Average HH income
$137,972 +46%
Chesapeake: $94,189
Poverty rate
7.8% -10%
Chesapeake: 8.7%
Renter share
10.4% -59%
Chesapeake: 25.7%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Chadswyck and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3–3

Why Chadswyck scores 3

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 3.2–3.2 across tracts
3.2
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.3–5.3 across tracts
5.3
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Rent control risk
62% of income on rent · Range 1.5–1.5 across tracts
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
10% renter households · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Economic stress
7.8% below poverty line · Range 1.9–1.9 across tracts
1.9
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 7.9–7.9 across tracts
7.9
Risk score comparison

Chadswyck vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Chadswyck score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.0ChadswyckNeighborhood3.4Parent cityhost city4.3Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Chadswyck

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
51550021504 3 3,413 62% $2,191
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 8

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 28%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 37%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 17%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 2%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Chadswyck

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Chadswyck

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Chadswyck?

Chadswyck scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Chadswyck compare to Chesapeake overall?

Chadswyck scores 0.4 points lower than Chesapeake overall (3.4/10). Renters spend 62% of income on rent vs 34% citywide. Average rent: $2,191 vs $1,586.
Q3

What is the average rent in Chadswyck?

Average gross rent in Chadswyck is $2,191/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Chadswyck residents are renters?

10% of Chadswyck households are renter-occupied (vs 26% in Chesapeake). The neighborhood has 3,413 residents.
Q5

Is Chadswyck a high social-vulnerability area?

Chadswyck sits in the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Chadswyck for landlords?

Chadswyck carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Chesapeake as a whole (3.4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Chadswyck?

Chadswyck has 3,381 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (87.5%), Other / Multiracial (5.1%), Black (non-Hispanic) (4.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Chadswyck

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Chesapeake

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Chadswyck.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further