Hunter Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Hunt

What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 51.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Food insecurity runs 5.3% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 3.5% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.1 points below the Fairfax County average of 4.3. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 filings here across 4 tracked years.

The worst year on record was 2016, when 2.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.