Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Ridgeview Eviction Risk: Lower , Rose Hill

Tract 51059420700 · Fairfax County, VA · pop 4,993 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 51059420700 in the Ridgeview area of Rose Hill, VA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. 74% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Fairfax County average of 41.0%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 4% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,335
Renter share14.5%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate0.7%
Median income$181,042

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Ridgeview
Moderate
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Rose Hill
Moderate
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 274 tracts In Fairfax County
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,798 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rose Hill and the region

Centroid at 38.7858, -77.1052 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ridgeview scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rose Hill
2.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.1
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
0.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,629 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rose Hill
2.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rose Hill
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rose Hill
3.2

How Ridgeview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ridgeview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 420700Rose Hill: 3.43.4Rose Hillparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 24Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 3.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.5%Peak (2016)
  • 14Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 510594207002011: 4 filings (2.14/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (2.14/100 renter HHs)2013: 2 filings (1.07/100 renter HHs)2016: 14 filings (7.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 250% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ridgeview

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, local political climate reads 2.4/10.

Against the Fairfax County average of 4.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.5/10. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 9.1% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 24 eviction filings across 4 observed years.

The voucher gap is 13.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The worst year on record was 2016, when 7.5% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 3.2% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $181,042, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 51059420700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51059420700?

Census tract 51059420700 in the Ridgeview neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 51059420700?

Median gross rent is $2,629/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 74% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 51059420700?

0.7% of residents in tract 51059420700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,993.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 51059420700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 62th, minority 72th, housing 6th.
Q5

Is tract 51059420700 considered part of Ridgeview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51059420700 fall within Ridgeview (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51059420700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 51059420700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.21% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 51059420700 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 51059420700 compare to Rose Hill overall?

Tract 51059420700 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Rose Hill at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rose Hill; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rose Hill

Top eight tracts in Rose Hill ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related