Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally

Cashmere Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53007960501 · Chelan County, WA · pop 2,764 · 1% of tract blocks fall in Cashmere

Census tract 53007960501 covers part of Cashmere, WA, and scores 3.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 18% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units931
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$91,806

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Cashmere
Moderate
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 23 tracts In Chelan County
Very Low
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#1,495 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#50,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cashmere and the region

Centroid at 47.5640, -120.4920 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cashmere scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cashmere
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$849 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cashmere
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cashmere
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cashmere
6.4

How Cashmere compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cashmere risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 960501Cashmere: 4.64.6Cashmereparent cityCounty: 5.25.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cashmere

On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.2/10.

It sits 1.3 points below the Chelan County average of 5.2. Average gross rent is $849, 20% below the Cashmere average. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 11% of average household income of $91,806, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 53007960501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53007960501?

Census tract 53007960501 in Cashmere scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53007960501?

Median gross rent is $849/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53007960501?

5.0% of residents in tract 53007960501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,764.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53007960501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 78th, minority 30th, housing 84th.
Q5

How does tract 53007960501 compare to Cashmere overall?

Tract 53007960501 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Cashmere at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cashmere; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cashmere

Top eight tracts in Cashmere ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related