Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Cashmere Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 53007960501 · Chelan County, WA · pop 2,764 · 1% of tract blocks fall in Cashmere
How risky is Cashmere in Chelan County for landlords? Census tract 53007960501 scores 3.5/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 5% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $849 a month while the average household earns $91,806 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units931
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$91,806
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
18
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
National
51
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cashmere and the region
Centroid at 47.5640, -120.4920 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cashmere scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cashmere
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$849 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cashmere
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cashmere
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cashmere
6.4
How Cashmere compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 84%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cashmere
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cashmere, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Chelan County average of 4.3 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 53007960501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53007960501?
Census tract 53007960501 in Cashmere scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53007960501?
Median gross rent is $849/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53007960501?
5.0% of residents in tract 53007960501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,764.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53007960501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 78th, minority 30th, housing 84th.
Q5
How does tract 53007960501 compare to Cashmere overall?
Tract 53007960501 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Cashmere at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cashmere; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cashmere
Top eight tracts in Cashmere ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related