Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Cashmere Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53007960502 · Chelan County, WA · pop 5,428 · 0% of tract blocks fall in Cashmere

Census tract 53007960502 sits in Cashmere in Chelan County, Washington eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. That is riskier than about 13% of US census tracts.

17% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $110,158 a year. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 21% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share25.8%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$110,158

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Cashmere
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 23 tracts In Chelan County
Very Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#1,217 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Low
National
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cashmere and the region

Centroid at 47.4496, -120.6034 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cashmere scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cashmere
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cashmere
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cashmere
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cashmere
6.4

How Cashmere compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cashmere risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 960502Cashmere: 6.36.3Cashmereparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cashmere

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cashmere, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Chelan County average of 4.3 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53007960502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53007960502?

Census tract 53007960502 in Cashmere scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 53007960502?

5.0% of residents in tract 53007960502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,428.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 53007960502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 73th, minority 36th, housing 56th.
Q4

How does tract 53007960502 compare to Cashmere overall?

Tract 53007960502 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Cashmere at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cashmere; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cashmere

Top eight tracts in Cashmere ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related