Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Cashmere Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53007960600 · Chelan County, WA · pop 4,177 · 59% of tract blocks fall in Cashmere

In Cashmere in Chelan County, census tract 53007960600 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 37% of US census tracts.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,048 a month while the average household earns $67,356 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 15% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,462
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$67,356

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Cashmere
Very High
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 23 tracts In Chelan County
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#817 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,159 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cashmere and the region

Centroid at 47.5091, -120.4640 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cashmere scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cashmere
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,048 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cashmere
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cashmere
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cashmere
6.4

How Cashmere compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cashmere risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 960600Cashmere: 6.36.3Cashmereparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 23Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 0.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.0%Peak (2010)
  • 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530079606002004: 3 filings (0.56/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (0.80/100 renter HHs)2017: 2 filings (0.40/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 8 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cashmere

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cashmere, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Chelan County average of 4.3 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 23 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 0.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.0% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53007960600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53007960600?

Census tract 53007960600 in Cashmere scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53007960600?

Median gross rent is $1,048/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53007960600?

8.0% of residents in tract 53007960600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,177.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53007960600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 98th, minority 40th, housing 94th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53007960600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 23 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 53007960600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.67% of renter households, peaking at 1.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53007960600 compare to Cashmere overall?

Tract 53007960600 scores 4.6/10, lower than the parent city of Cashmere at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cashmere; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cashmere

Top eight tracts in Cashmere ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related