Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Firs Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53061052114 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 4,842

Census tract 53061052114 belongs to Silver Firs, Washington. It is home to 4,842 residents and scores 4.9/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 31% of renter households, a high level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,908 a month while the average household earns $181,895 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 3% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,595
Renter share4.2%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$181,895

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Silver Firs
Moderate
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#135 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#1,618 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#73,892 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Silver Firs and the region

Centroid at 47.8507, -122.1547 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Firs scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,908 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Silver Firs
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Silver Firs
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.1

How Silver Firs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Firs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 052114Silver Firs: 6.66.6Silver Firsparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 2.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.2%Peak (2016)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530610521142008: 2 filings (1.68/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Firs

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Silver Firs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 7 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 2.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.2% of renter households in 2016.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061052114

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052114?

Census tract 53061052114 in Silver Firs scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061052114?

Median gross rent is $2,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052114?

6.6% of residents in tract 53061052114 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,842.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052114?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 11th, minority 39th, housing 24th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061052114?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 53061052114 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.05% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53061052114 compare to Silver Firs overall?

Tract 53061052114 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Silver Firs at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Silver Firs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Silver Firs

Top eight tracts in Silver Firs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related