Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally
Laurel Oaks Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lacey
Tract 53067011628 ·
Thurston County, WA · pop 5,880 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 53067011628 sits in the Laurel Oaks area of Lacey eviction risk, WA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. It is home to 5,880 residents. 28% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Thurston County average of 47.2%.
Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 6%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units2,165
Renter share8.8%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$109,226
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Laurel Oaks
Very Low
Within parent city
14th percentile
#13 of 15 tracts In Lacey
Very Low
Within county
45th percentile
#34 of 61 tracts In Thurston County
Moderate
Within state
46th percentile
#957 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lacey and the region
Centroid at 47.0199, -122.7688 · click any tract to drill in
Why Laurel Oaks scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lacey
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,505 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lacey
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lacey
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lacey
6.5
How Laurel Oaks compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
13%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
43%Racial/ethnic minority
40%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Laurel Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.5/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.7/10.
On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 2.2/10. At $1,505 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Lacey commands. That is riskier than roughly 74% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.6/10. Against average income of $109,226, annual rent is just 17%.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Thurston County average of 5.8 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53067011628
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067011628?
Census tract 53067011628 in the Laurel Oaks neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53067011628?
Median gross rent is $1,505/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53067011628?
6.8% of residents in tract 53067011628 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,880.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53067011628?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 61th, minority 43th, housing 40th.
Q5
Is tract 53067011628 considered part of Laurel Oaks?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53067011628 fall within Laurel Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 53067011628 compare to Lacey overall?
Tract 53067011628 scores 5.7/10, lower than the parent city of Lacey at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lacey eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lacey
Top eight tracts in Lacey ranked by composite eviction-risk score.