Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Birmingham Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 01073003803 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,293

01073003803 is a census tract in Birmingham, AL. It scores 5.4/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,293 residents. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 24% Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,601
Renter share62.3%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate35.4%
Median income$37,718

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#7 of 71 tracts In Birmingham
Very High
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#61 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Elevated
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#73 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
National
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#24,859 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Birmingham and the region

Centroid at 33.4860, -86.8697 · click any tract to drill in

Why Birmingham scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
35.4% poverty · this tract
8.8
Supply constraint
$1,039 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0

How Birmingham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Birmingham risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.4This tracttract 0038034.0Birminghamparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 819Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 9.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.0%Peak (2001)
  • 41Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073003803
Filings dropped 64% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Birmingham

Food insecurity runs 43.4% against 17.8% nationally. Against Jefferson County at 46.3%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

The poverty rate is 35%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Running hot, economic stress reads 8.8/10. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $37,718, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Housing insecurity runs 29.9% against 14.2% nationally. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.1 points above the Jefferson County average of 4.3.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 819 filings here across 11 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 14.0% of renter households.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073003803

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073003803?

Census tract 01073003803 in Birmingham scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073003803?

Median gross rent is $1,039/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073003803?

35.4% of residents in tract 01073003803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,293.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073003803?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 88th, minority 97th, housing 70th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073003803?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 819 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073003803 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.14% of renter households, peaking at 14.0% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073003803 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073003803 compare to Birmingham overall?

Tract 01073003803 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 01073003803 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 82% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham

Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related