Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Lane Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Mountain Brook
Tract 01073010801 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 7,459 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
01073010801 is a census tract in the Lane Park area of Mountain Brook, AL. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 7,459 residents. Against Jefferson County at 46.3%, about a quarter of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units3,125
Renter share27.8%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$129,438
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mountain Brook and the region
Centroid at 33.4946, -86.7638 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lane Park scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mountain Brook
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,500 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mountain Brook
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mountain Brook
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mountain Brook
3.3
How Lane Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 3%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 6%Racial/ethnic minority
- 37%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 28%Grade A
- 9%Grade B
- 35%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 85Total filings over 11 yrs
- 0.91%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.3%Peak (2002)
- 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lane Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.3%Housing insecurity
- 2.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.7%Food insecurity
- 2.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 21.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lane Park
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
Food insecurity runs 4.7% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 2.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points. The voucher gap is 18.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 85 filings here across 11 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2002, when 1.3% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073010801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010801?
Census tract 01073010801 in the Lane Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073010801?
Median gross rent is $1,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010801?
2.6% of residents in tract 01073010801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,459.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 10th, minority 6th, housing 37th.
Q5
Is tract 01073010801 considered part of Lane Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010801 fall within Lane Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073010801?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073010801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.91% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073010801 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073010801 compare to Mountain Brook overall?
Tract 01073010801 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Mountain Brook at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mountain Brook eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01073010801 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mountain Brook
Top eight tracts in Mountain Brook ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related