Skip to content
Excursion Inlet, Alaska eviction risk overview
City brief · 62 residents

Excursion Inlet, AK Eviction Risk: LOW

Haines Borough · Population 62

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

27th percentile, Alaska.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average2.6 Now2.8
4.3 2.3 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.3 1990 · score 2.4 1991 · score 2.4 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.5 1994 · score 2.5 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.4 1999 · score 2.4 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.4 2006 · score 2.4 2007 · score 2.4 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.6 2011 · score 2.6 2012 · score 2.7 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.8 2017 · score 2.8 2018 · score 2.8 2019 · score 2.8 2020 · score 4.1 2021 · score 4.3 2022 · score 3.4 2023 · score 3.1 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 1.8 Regional 3.7 State 2.2 Economic 4.8 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 1.5 Eviction 2.2 Tenant 1.0 Housing 2.3 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    1.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.7
  3. State political climate
    Alaska legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    24.2% poverty · 5.8% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,087 average · 24.4% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.6% of income on rent
    1.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    49 days filing → judgment
    2.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    24.4% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Excursion Inlet and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Excursion Inlet compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Haines Borough
High
#2 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 cities in Haines Borough for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Alaska
Low
#264 of 353 cities
Rank in state, 25th percentileLowHigh
#264 of 353 cities in Alaska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Excursion Inlet risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Excursion Inlet: 2.82.8Excursion InletThis cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 49d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,087/mo. A contested eviction takes 49 days and costs $1,494–$4,753 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 24.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 62 residents, 24.4% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 24.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 1.8 and 3.7. State climate at 2.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.2, housing court bias 2.3, rent-control risk 1.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 24.2% poverty, 5.8% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Excursion Inlet sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Anchorage, AK · 43d · ~$3.0k all-in ($70/day) · score 3.6 Anchorage Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Excursion Inlet
Excursion Inlet · 49d · ~$3.1k all-in ($64/day) · score 2.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Excursion Inlet, AK

Landlording in Excursion Inlet, Alaska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Excursion Inlet is a city of 62 residents where 24.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,087/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Excursion Inlet eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Excursion Inlet closes 49 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Excursion Inlet's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Excursion Inlet runs $1,494 to $4,753 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 49 days of typical timeline and $1,087/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Excursion Inlet, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Alaska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Excursion Inlet: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Alaska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,753 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Excursion Inlet

Trap · AS 34.03 URLTA
Compare Excursion Inlet to nearby cities in Haines Borough via the related-cities grid below. Each municipality scores separately on the same nine sub-factors. State context: AS 34.03 URLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant abandons the property in Excursion Inlet?

If you believe a tenant has abandoned the property, you can retake possession, but you must follow specific legal procedures to avoid wrongful eviction claims. Alaska law generally allows you to presume abandonment if the tenant has been absent for a certain period (usually 15 days or more, depending on rent payment status) and has removed substantially all of their belongings, or if they have given you clear notice of their intent to abandon. Always try to confirm abandonment in writing and document the condition of the property and any remaining items before re-entry.

Q2

Can I raise the rent in Excursion Inlet?

Yes, Alaska has no statewide rent control, so you are generally free to raise the rent. However, you must provide proper notice. For month-to-month tenancies, a 30-day written notice is typically required before the rent increase takes effect. For fixed-term leases, you can only raise the rent after the current lease term expires, and the new rate would apply to any renewal. Check our Alaska rent control rules for more details.

Q3

Do I need a reason to not renew a lease in Excursion Inlet?

No, Alaska does not have statewide "just-cause" eviction requirements. For month-to-month tenancies or when a fixed-term lease is expiring, you can generally choose not to renew without providing a specific reason, as long as your decision is not discriminatory or retaliatory. You must still provide proper notice, typically 30 days, before the lease term ends or before the non-renewal takes effect for month-to-month agreements.

Q4

What happens to a tenant's personal belongings after an eviction?

After an eviction in Excursion Inlet, you generally have a responsibility to store the tenant's personal property for a set period, typically 15 days. You must notify the tenant of where their belongings are being stored and how they can retrieve them. If they don't claim their property within the specified time, you may be able to sell or dispose of it, using the proceeds to cover storage costs or other damages. Consult with an attorney on specific procedures for handling abandoned property to ensure compliance.

Q5

How do I handle maintenance requests in Excursion Inlet?

As a landlord, you have an obligation to maintain a safe and habitable property. Respond to maintenance requests promptly and in writing. Document the request, the action taken, and the date completed. For non-emergency repairs, tenants typically need to give you notice and a reasonable amount of time to fix the issue before they can take action like withholding rent (which is complex and rarely advised) or moving out. Keep open lines of communication and address issues before they escalate.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Excursion Inlet in the 27th percentile of Alaska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.