Skip to content
Marshall, Alaska eviction risk overview
City brief · 386 residents

Marshall, AK Eviction Risk: LOW

Kusilvak Census Area · Population 386

In 2026
Risk score
3.6
LOW

99th percentile, Alaska.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average2.9 Now3.6
4.6 2.5 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.6 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.7 1987 · score 2.7 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.7 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.7 2003 · score 2.7 2004 · score 2.7 2005 · score 2.7 2006 · score 2.7 2007 · score 2.7 2008 · score 2.7 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.9 2013 · score 2.9 2014 · score 2.9 2015 · score 2.9 2016 · score 3.0 2017 · score 3.0 2018 · score 3.0 2019 · score 3.1 2020 · score 4.3 2021 · score 4.6 2022 · score 3.7 2023 · score 3.3 2024 · score 3.6 2025 · score 3.6 2026 · score 3.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 1.8 Regional 3.7 State 2.2 Economic 9.5 Supply 3.3 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.2 Tenant 3.3 Housing 2.1 3.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    1.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.7
  3. State political climate
    Alaska legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    34.0% poverty · 20.9% unemp.
    9.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $823 average · 14.7% renters
    3.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.4% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    42 days filing → judgment
    2.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.7% renters
    3.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Marshall and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Marshall compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Kusilvak Census Area
Very High
#1 of 13 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 13 cities in Kusilvak Census Area for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Alaska
Very High
#17 of 353 cities
Rank in state, 96th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 353 cities in Alaska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Marshall risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Marshall: 3.63.6MarshallThis cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 42d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $823/mo. A contested eviction takes 42 days and costs $1,418–$4,257 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 386 residents, 14.7% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 34.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 1.8 and 3.7. State climate at 2.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.2, housing court bias 2.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9.5. Supply constraint: 3.3. The numbers behind those: 34.0% poverty, 20.9% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Marshall sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Anchorage, AK · 43d · ~$3.0k all-in ($70/day) · score 3.6 Anchorage Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Marshall
Marshall · 42d · ~$2.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Marshall, AK

Landlording in Marshall, Alaska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Marshall is a city of 386 residents where 14.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.4% of income on rent. At an average rent of $823/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Marshall eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Marshall closes 42 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Marshall's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Marshall runs $1,418 to $4,257 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 42 days of typical timeline and $823/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.3/10 in Marshall, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Alaska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Marshall: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Alaska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,257 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Marshall

Trap · AS 34.03 URLTA
At 3.2/10, standard documentation typically resolves cases quickly under AS 34.03 URLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Marshall without a reason?

For a month-to-month tenancy, yes, you can terminate without cause by giving a 30-day written notice. For a fixed-term lease, you generally need a lease violation or other specific cause to evict before the lease term ends.

Q2

What's the biggest mistake landlords make during eviction here?

The biggest mistake is failing to serve proper notice or making procedural errors in court filings. Even a minor misstep can cause delays, forcing you to restart the process and incur more costs. Always double-check your notices and consider legal counsel.

Q3

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Marshall?

You have 14 days to return a security deposit if the tenant gives proper notice and leaves the unit clean. If they didn't give proper notice or left the unit unclean, you have 30 days. Always provide an itemized list of deductions.

Q4

Is "cash for keys" a good idea in Marshall?

Yes, "cash for keys" can be an excellent strategy in Marshall. It can save you significant time and legal fees compared to a contested eviction, and it ensures you get your property back sooner and often in better condition. Always get the agreement in writing.

Q5

Can I turn off utilities to force a tenant out?

No. Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or removing a tenant's belongings yourself is considered an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in severe penalties, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. Always follow the legal eviction process.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.6/10 places Marshall in the 99th percentile of Alaska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.