Skip to content
Cienega Springs, Arizona eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,958 residents

Cienega Springs, AZ Eviction Risk: MODERATE

La Paz County · Population 1,958

In 2026
Risk score
4.5
MODERATE

74th percentile, Arizona.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average3.2 Now4.5
10 5 1976 · score 1.6 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.9 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.3 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.3 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.6 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 3.7 2009 · score 3.8 2010 · score 3.9 2011 · score 3.9 2012 · score 3.9 2013 · score 4.0 2014 · score 4.1 2015 · score 4.2 2016 · score 4.4 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.7 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 5.4 2021 · score 5.4 2022 · score 5.4 2023 · score 5.5 2024 · score 4.7 2025 · score 4.5 2026 · score 4.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 3.8 State 2.2 Economic 7.7 Supply 6.0 Rent Control 4.7 Eviction 1.8 Tenant 6.9 Housing 6.4 4.5 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +44.2% (2024)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.8
  3. State political climate
    Arizona legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    21.7% poverty · 5.8% unemp.
    7.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $924 average · 35.1% renters
    6.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.1% of income on rent
    4.7
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    41 days filing → judgment
    1.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    35.1% renters
    6.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cienega Springs and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Cienega Springs compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in La Paz County
High
#3 of 19 cities
Rank in county — 89th percentileBottomTop
#3 of 19 cities in La Paz County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arizona
Elevated
#126 of 464 cities
Rank in state — 73th percentileBottomTop
#126 of 464 cities in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Cienega Springs risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Cienega Springs: 4.54.5Cienega SpringsThis cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.5
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 41d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $924/mo. A contested eviction takes 41 days and costs $1,967–$5,053 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 35.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,958 residents, 35.1% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 21.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 3.8 (GOP margin +44.2% (2024)). State climate at 2.2 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.8, housing court bias 6.4, rent-control risk 4.7. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.7. Supply constraint: 6.0. The numbers behind those: 21.7% poverty, 5.8% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Cienega Springs sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Lake Havasu City, AZ · 40d · ~$3.4k all-in ($85/day) · score 3.5 Lake Havasu City Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Tucson, AZ · 43d · ~$3.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.6 Tucson Mesa, AZ · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 3.1 Mesa Gilbert, AZ · 37d · ~$3.6k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.4 Gilbert Chandler, AZ · 40d · ~$3.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.7 Chandler Glendale, AZ · 42d · ~$3.0k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.6 Glendale Scottsdale, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($88/day) · score 2.4 Scottsdale Peoria, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.7 Peoria Tempe, AZ · 37d · ~$3.0k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.6 Tempe Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Cienega Springs
Cienega Springs · 41d · ~$3.5k all-in ($86/day) · score 4.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Cienega Springs, AZ

Landlording in Cienega Springs, Arizona, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.5/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Cienega Springs is a city of 1,958 residents where 35.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $924/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Cienega Springs eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.8/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Cienega Springs closes 41 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Cienega Springs's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Cienega Springs runs $1,967 to $5,053 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 41 days of typical timeline and $924/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.9/10 in Cienega Springs, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.7/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arizona, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Cienega Springs: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arizona's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $5,053 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Cienega Springs

Trap · 4.7/10
The 4.5/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. Cienega Springs's rent-control-risk sub-score is 4.7/10, driven by state preemption and market dynamics.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

How quickly can I get a tenant out for not paying rent in Cienega Springs?

The fastest practical timeline is around 41 days from the rent due date to a sheriff lockout. This assumes you act immediately after the grace period, file promptly, and there are no court delays or tenant defenses. The 5-day pay-or-quit notice is the first step, followed by court proceedings and then the Writ of Restitution.

Q2

Can I keep the security deposit for unpaid rent?

Yes, in Arizona, you can deduct unpaid rent, damages beyond normal wear and tear, and cleaning costs from the security deposit. You must provide an itemized statement of these deductions to the tenant within 14 business days of them vacating the property and providing a forwarding address. Ensure you have clear documentation for any deductions.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Cienega Springs?

While Arizona law allows landlords to represent themselves in Justice Court, especially for straightforward non-payment evictions, hiring an attorney is often advisable. They can ensure all notices are correct, court procedures are followed precisely, and can navigate any tenant defenses. This can prevent costly delays or even dismissal of your case due to procedural errors. The cost of a lawyer often pays for itself by shortening the timeline and securing a positive outcome.

Q4

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the court orders an eviction?

If the court grants you a judgment for possession and the tenant still won't move, you must obtain a Writ of Restitution from the court. This is a legal order authorizing the La Paz County Sheriff's Department to physically remove the tenant and their belongings. You cannot force them out yourself; this is considered an illegal self-help eviction and can lead to severe penalties.

Q5

Are there any rent control rules in Cienega Springs or Arizona?

No, Arizona has a statewide preemption against rent control. This means no city or county in Arizona, including Cienega Springs, can enact rent control ordinances. You generally have the ability to set and increase rents as you deem appropriate, subject to the terms of your lease agreement and proper notice. For more information, see our Arizona rent control rules guide.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.5/10 places Cienega Springs in the 74th percentile of Arizona cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.