Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Colonial Coronita Eviction Risk: Lower , Chandler

Tract 04013814900 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 3,178 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 04013814900 in the Colonial Coronita area of Gilbert, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,178. 7% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Maricopa County average of 46.0%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 17% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,043
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$148,244

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Colonial Coronita
Very Low
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 58 tracts In Chandler
Low
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#969 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
Very Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chandler and the region

Centroid at 33.3149, -111.7869 · click any tract to drill in

Why Colonial Coronita scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chandler
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,982 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chandler
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chandler
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chandler
2.0

How Colonial Coronita compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Colonial Coronita risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 814900Chandler: 3.23.2Chandlerparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 36Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 15.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 26.3%Peak (2003)
  • 10Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040138149002001: 7 filings (18.42/100 renter HHs)2002: 8 filings (21.05/100 renter HHs)2003: 10 filings (26.32/100 renter HHs)2004: 1 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2005: 10 filings (7.81/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 43% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Colonial Coronita. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Colonial Coronita

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. SNAP participation runs 5.3% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 36 filings here across 5 tracked years.

It sits 0.7 points below the Maricopa County average of 3.7. The worst year on record was 2003, when 26.3% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 15.2% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 18% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013814900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013814900?

Census tract 04013814900 in the Colonial Coronita neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013814900?

Median gross rent is $1,982/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 7% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013814900?

2.9% of residents in tract 04013814900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,178.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013814900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 17th, minority 54th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 04013814900 considered part of Colonial Coronita?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013814900 fall within Colonial Coronita (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013814900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 36 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013814900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.25% of renter households, peaking at 26.3% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013814900 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013814900 compare to Chandler overall?

Tract 04013814900 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Chandler at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chandler eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chandler

Top eight tracts in Chandler ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related