Maricopa County, Arizona Eviction Risk: Low
45 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Phoenix (3.1) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #10 of 15 AZ counties
4.4M residents · 45 cities · 1.0k tracts
Maricopa County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord15.5%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Maricopa County, AZ, tenants prevail in roughly 15.5% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline39dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Maricopa County, AZ until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 39 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.8–4.6klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Maricopa County, AZ costs landlords $1,806 to $4,605 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$1,74731% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Maricopa County, AZ is $1,747 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 31% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters35.6%of households35.6% of occupied housing units in Maricopa County, AZ are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty11.3%4.6% unemp.11.3% of Maricopa County, AZ residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 4.6%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Maricopa County averages 2.7/10 across 45 cities, spanning from a low of 2.5 to a high of 5.3 in Komatke, the riskiest city in the county. Ranked 4th of 15 Arizona counties by eviction risk (rank 1 = highest risk).
How Maricopa County ranks in Arizona
Landlord guides for Arizona
Eviction filings in Maricopa County
Our eviction records directly track Maricopa County. In the past month, 6,456 filings were recorded, 0.99× the historical baseline (below baseline). YTD filings: 26,474; pandemic-era total: 414,3911
- 6,456Past month
- 84,136Past 12 months
- 0.99×vs baseline (12 mo)
- 21.2%Serial filings
- $1,766Average rent
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Phoenix | 1,642,323 | 2.8 | 31.0% | $1,582 | IND |
| 002 | Mesa | 511,764 | 2.8 | 32.3% | $1,620 | IND |
| 003 | Gilbert | 280,262 | 2.4 | 28.9% | $2,110 | IND |
| 004 | Chandler | 280,136 | 2.5 | 28.4% | $1,902 | IND |
| 005 | Glendale | 252,833 | 2.9 | 34.4% | $1,528 | IND |
| 006 | Scottsdale | 243,821 | 2.3 | 29.2% | $2,013 | IND |
| 007 | Peoria | 196,906 | 2.4 | 33.8% | $1,843 | IND |
| 008 | Tempe | 188,065 | 3.1 | 31.3% | $1,743 | IND |
| 009 | Surprise | 154,948 | 2.4 | 32.2% | $2,033 | IND |
| 010 | Goodyear | 107,645 | 2.5 | 37.1% | $1,956 | IND |
| 011 | Buckeye | 104,923 | 2.5 | 28.3% | $1,963 | IND |
| 012 | Avondale | 92,477 | 2.6 | 32.7% | $1,832 | IND |
| 013 | Queen Creek | 71,867 | 2.5 | 29.5% | $2,210 | IND |
| 014 | Sun City | 37,486 | 2.5 | 42.0% | $1,569 | IND |
| 015 | El Mirage | 36,088 | 2.7 | 28.8% | $1,806 | IND |
| 016 | Sun City West | 27,425 | 2.6 | 42.2% | $1,672 | IND |
| 017 | Fountain Hills | 23,789 | 2.6 | 31.3% | $1,890 | IND |
| 018 | Anthem | 22,584 | 2.5 | 36.4% | $2,548 | IND |
| 019 | New River | 18,240 | 2.3 | 33.9% | $1,948 | IND |
| 020 | Sun Lakes | 13,924 | 2.6 | 48.8% | $1,938 | IND |
| 021 | Paradise Valley | 12,611 | 2.0 | 14.7% | $3,501 | IND |
| 022 | Wickenburg | 8,059 | 2.5 | 42.4% | $991 | IND |
| 023 | Tolleson | 7,668 | 2.6 | 47.8% | $1,309 | IND |
| 024 | Youngtown | 7,015 | 2.6 | 33.3% | $1,157 | IND |
| 025 | Litchfield Park | 6,916 | 2.4 | 38.2% | $1,922 | IND |
| 026 | Guadalupe | 5,272 | 2.5 | 39.6% | $872 | IND |
| 027 | Citrus Park | 5,115 | 2.4 | 37.5% | $2,863 | IND |
| 028 | Cave Creek | 5,091 | 2.4 | 24.6% | $2,493 | IND |
| 029 | Carefree | 3,683 | 2.6 | 46.0% | $1,538 | IND |
| 030 | Rio Verde | 2,261 | 2.2 | 19.6% | $1,772 | IND |
| 031 | Gila Bend | 1,363 | 2.0 | 14.6% | $1,069 | IND |
| 032 | Circle City | 1,089 | 2.5 | 27.3% | $850 | IND |
| 033 | Maricopa Colony | 836 | 2.4 | 17.8% | $1,718 | IND |
| 034 | Gila Crossing | 830 | 3.0 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 035 | Komatke | 809 | 2.8 | 22.9% | $1,718 | IND |
| 036 | Wittmann | 631 | 2.0 | 30.9% | $1,260 | IND |
| 037 | Aguila | 284 | 3.0 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 038 | Sacate Village | 283 | 2.4 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 039 | Wintersburg | 152 | 2.2 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 040 | Morristown | 138 | 2.0 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 041 | Santa Cruz | 101 | 2.2 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 042 | Kaka | 83 | 2.5 | 32.3% | $1,044 | IND |
| 043 | Arlington | 37 | 2.3 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
| 044 | Tonopah | 14 | 2.9 | 37.8% | $1,516 | IND |
| 045 | Theba | 7 | 2.0 | 31.7% | $1,718 | IND |
County heatmap
Neighborhoods in Maricopa County
Top 30 neighborhoods by population. Click for a pop-weighted risk score and the constituent census tracts.
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Maricopa County carries an average eviction-risk score of 2.7/10 (Low), placing it in the higher-risk third of Arizona's 15 counties, ranked 4th of 15 statewide, meaning only three Arizona counties post higher risk. For landlords and investors operating across the county's 45 cities, that headline figure masks a meaningful spread: individual city scores run from 2 to 3.1, a gap wide enough to separate genuinely stable rental markets from pockets where tenant financial stress and vacancy pressure are measurably elevated. With an average rent of $1,747 and a rent-burden rate of 31.5%, roughly a third of renters in the county are already cost-strained, which is the upstream driver of most nonpayment filings.
Arizona as a whole leans landlord-friendly on the legal side, and Maricopa County benefits from that framework, but local demographics still set the ceiling on actual operating conditions. A 35.6% renter share across the county keeps demand healthy, and the absence of local rent control (preempted statewide) removes a regulatory layer that weighs on markets elsewhere. The practical risk here is concentrated in specific submarkets, not spread evenly across the metro.
The cities inside Maricopa County
At the high-risk end, Komatke scores 2.8/10, Avondale reaches 2.6/10, and El Mirage and Theba both sit at 2.7/10. Tempe, with a population of 188,065, scores 3.1/10, the highest reading among the county's larger cities, reflecting a dense renter base and elevated cost burden typical of a college-adjacent market. Tolleson also posts 2.6/10. These western and central-suburban markets warrant tighter tenant screening and more conservative vacancy assumptions.
The picture shifts substantially in the county's wealthier corridors. Scottsdale scores 2.3/10 across a population of 243,821, and Gilbert comes in at 2.4/10 among its 280,262 residents, two of the county's most stable operating environments. Mesa at 2.8/10 and Phoenix, the county seat with 1,642,323 residents, at 3.9/10 represent mid-range risk: large, liquid rental markets but with broader income variation than the suburban fringe. Risk in this county is genuinely hyper-local; a portfolio built entirely in Scottsdale and Gilbert faces a materially different operating profile than one concentrated in Avondale or Tempe. Working with experienced property management in Maricopa County is one practical way to navigate that variation across submarkets.
State-level laws that apply here
Arizona state law (A.R.S. § 33-1301 et seq.) gives landlords a relatively short notice runway before filing. Nonpayment of rent and material irreparable breaches each require only a 5-day notice, curable material noncompliance triggers a 10-day notice, and terminating a month-to-month tenancy requires 30 days. Once filed, an uncontested eviction typically resolves in 21 to 35 days; a contested case can stretch to 60 to 120 days. The Arizona eviction process is comparatively streamlined versus many Sun Belt peers, but contested cases still carry real carrying costs. Court filing fees run $210 to $350, sheriff lockout fees add another $50 to $150, and attorney fees for a contested matter range from $500 to $3,000. Understanding Arizona eviction costs before an incident, not after, is the kind of planning that separates professional operators from reactive ones. Arizona has no just-cause requirement for terminations and state law preempts any local rent-control ordinance, leaving landlords with maximum flexibility on pricing and lease renewal decisions.
With an average poverty rate of 11.3% and renters making up 35.6% of households, the county's risk is real but unevenly distributed; the city grid above breaks down the score for each of the 45 Maricopa County cities so you can pinpoint where that risk actually lives before committing capital. Maricopa County property managers who specialize in tenant placement and compliance can also be a key resource for investors targeting the higher-risk submarkets.
Historical eviction filings in Maricopa County
From 2001 to 2017, eviction filings in Maricopa County declined 10%. The peak was 83,685 filings in 2005.2
- 72,8272001
- 83,685Peak (2005)
- 65,6942017
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Maricopa County compares
Maricopa County scores 2.7/10 (Low risk), placing it 4th of 15 Arizona eviction laws counties by eviction risk where rank 1 is the highest-risk. Among peer counties, Coconino County is riskier at 4.0/10, while Pinal County (3.3/10), Navajo County (3.3/10), Yuma County (3.0/10), and Yavapai County (3.0/10) all score lower, meaning Maricopa eviction risk carries more tenant-financial-stress exposure than the majority of Arizona eviction laws's 15 counties.
Despite its Low tier designation, Maricopa's broad intra-county spread, from 2.5 at the safest end to 5.3 in Komatke, makes submarket selection more consequential here than in most Arizona counties, and investors should weigh city-level scores alongside the county average.