Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally

Shadow Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glendale

Tract 04013104214 · Maricopa, AZ · pop 2,183 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

04013104214 is a census tract in the Shadow Hills area of Glendale, AZ. It scores 4.8/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,183. 83% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 1% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units935
Renter share20.5%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate19.9%
Median income$69,987

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Shadow Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 59 tracts In Glendale
Elevated
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#188 of 1,009 tracts In Maricopa
High
Within state
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#340 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glendale and the region

Centroid at 33.6320, -112.1772 · click any tract to drill in

Why Shadow Hills scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glendale
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
19.9% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$3,154 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
3.0

How Shadow Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Shadow Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 104214Glendale: 3.53.5Glendaleparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 37Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 7.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.6%Peak (2001)
  • 8Filings in 2005 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2005
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040131042142001: 12 filings (12.63/100 renter HHs)2002: 5 filings (5.26/100 renter HHs)2003: 8 filings (8.42/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (4.21/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (8.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Shadow Hills

Cost burden runs 97% here against 46.0% across Maricopa County. Annualized rent equals 54% of average household income of $69,987, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. At $3,154 a month, rents run 106% over what the rest of Glendale commands.

The voucher gap is 61.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. It sits 1.1 points above the Maricopa County average of 3.7.

The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 37 filings here across 5 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2001, when 12.6% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #35,669 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04013104214

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04013104214?

Census tract 04013104214 in the Shadow Hills neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04013104214?

Median gross rent is $3,154/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 97% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04013104214?

19.9% of residents in tract 04013104214 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,183.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04013104214?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 62th, minority 39th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 04013104214 considered part of Shadow Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04013104214 fall within Shadow Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04013104214?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 04013104214 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.81% of renter households, peaking at 12.6% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 04013104214 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 04013104214 compare to Glendale overall?

Tract 04013104214 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Glendale at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Glendale

Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related