Skip to content
Marmaduke, Arkansas eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,240 residents

Marmaduke, AR Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Greene County · Population 1,240

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

43th percentile, Arkansas.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average3.2 Now2.2
4.2 2.2 1976 · score 4.1 1977 · score 4.1 1978 · score 4.1 1979 · score 4.2 1980 · score 4.2 1981 · score 4.2 1982 · score 4.1 1983 · score 4.0 1984 · score 3.9 1985 · score 3.8 1986 · score 3.7 1987 · score 3.6 1988 · score 3.5 1989 · score 3.1 1990 · score 3.0 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 3.5 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.5 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.4 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.3 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.2 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.0 2008 · score 3.0 2009 · score 3.1 2010 · score 3.0 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.8 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.0 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.4 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.8 Regional 2.8 State 1.8 Economic 6.1 Supply 5.9 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 9.2 Housing 6.7 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +61.2% (2024)
    2.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.8
  3. State political climate
    Arkansas legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    23.7% poverty · 1.6% unemp.
    6.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $748 average · 52.2% renters
    5.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.8% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    28 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    52.2% renters
    9.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Marmaduke and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Marmaduke compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Greene County
Moderate
#5 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 cities in Greene County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arkansas
Low
#395 of 621 cities
Rank in state, 37th percentileLowHigh
#395 of 621 cities in Arkansas for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Marmaduke risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Marmaduke: 2.22.2MarmadukeThis cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-1.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 28d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $748/mo. A contested eviction takes 28 days and costs $928–$2,322 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 52.2%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,240 residents, 52.2% rent. 29% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 23.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.8 and 2.8 (GOP margin +61.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 6.7, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.1. Supply constraint: 5.9. The numbers behind those: 23.7% poverty, 1.6% unemployment, 29% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Marmaduke sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Jonesboro, AR · 28d · ~$1.8k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.5 Jonesboro Little Rock, AR · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.2 Little Rock Fayetteville, AR · 29d · ~$1.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.3 Fayetteville Fort Smith, AR · 25d · ~$1.6k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.4 Fort Smith Springdale, AR · 28d · ~$1.6k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.2 Springdale Rogers, AR · 30d · ~$1.7k all-in ($56/day) · score 2 Rogers Conway, AR · 30d · ~$1.7k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Conway North Little Rock, AR · 27d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 North Little Rock Bentonville, AR · 30d · ~$1.8k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.9 Bentonville Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Marmaduke
Marmaduke · 28d · ~$1.6k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Marmaduke, AR

Landlording in Marmaduke, Arkansas, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Marmaduke is a city of 1,240 residents where 52.2% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $748/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Marmaduke eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Marmaduke closes 28 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Marmaduke's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Marmaduke runs $928 to $2,322 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 28 days of typical timeline and $748/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.2/10 in Marmaduke, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arkansas, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Marmaduke: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arkansas's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,322 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Marmaduke

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 28 days and roughly $2,322 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $928 to $1,393 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under Ark. Code 18-16-101.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just disappears?

If your tenant abandons the property in Marmaduke, you need to follow specific steps outlined in Ark. Code § 18-17. Don't just change the locks. You generally need to send a notice of abandonment to their last known address. If they don't respond within a set period (usually 10 days), you can then legally regain possession. Always document everything and consider consulting an attorney to ensure you're compliant.
Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Marmaduke?

No, not whenever you want. While Arkansas has no rent control, you must provide proper notice to your tenant before raising the rent. For a month-to-month lease, typically a 30-day written notice is sufficient. If you have a fixed-term lease, you can only raise the rent after the lease term expires, unless the lease specifically allows for mid-term increases (which is rare).
Q3

What are common reasons landlords lose eviction cases in Arkansas?

Landlords often lose due to procedural errors. Common mistakes include improper notice (wrong timeframe, incorrect amounts, bad service), failing to properly document communications or payments, or attempting self-help eviction. Judges are strict about following the law. This is why having a clear understanding of Arkansas tenant protections and process is critical.
Q4

Can I charge a late fee for rent in Marmaduke?

Yes, you can charge a late fee, but it must be clearly stated in your lease agreement. Arkansas law allows for reasonable late fees. While there isn't a specific cap, excessive fees could be challenged in court. Typically, a late fee of 5-10% of the monthly rent is considered reasonable. Make sure your lease specifies when rent is considered late and the exact amount of the fee.
Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Marmaduke?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for an eviction in Arkansas. You can represent yourself in court. However, given the complexities of landlord-tenant law and the potential for costly mistakes, many landlords find it beneficial to hire an attorney, especially if the tenant is contesting the eviction or if it's your first time going through the process.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Marmaduke in the 43rd percentile of Arkansas cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.