Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,926 of 84,120 nationally

Camelback Eviction Risk: Moderate , Concord

Tract 06013327001 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 3,479 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

In Camelback in Concord, census tract 06013327001 scores 6.1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 79% of US census tracts.

About 69% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,775 a month while the average household earns $98,712 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 6% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,224
Renter share21.0%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$98,712

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Camelback
Very High
Within parent city
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 28 tracts In Concord
Elevated
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#77 of 241 tracts In Contra Costa
Elevated
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#5,551 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Concord and the region

Centroid at 37.9818, -122.0554 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camelback scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$2,775 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
6.6

How Camelback compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camelback risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 327001Concord: 8.08.0Concordparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Camelback. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camelback

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 80th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06013327001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013327001?

Census tract 06013327001 in the Camelback neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06013327001?

Median gross rent is $2,775/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06013327001?

8.8% of residents in tract 06013327001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,479.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06013327001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 76th, minority 71th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 06013327001 considered part of Camelback?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013327001 fall within Camelback (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06013327001 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06013327001 compare to Concord overall?

Tract 06013327001 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Concord

Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related