Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell

Tract 06037533902 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,454 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

06037533902 is a census tract in the Walker area of Bell Gardens, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,454 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 27% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,022
Renter share71.6%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate14.2%
Median income$57,803

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#5 of 22 tracts In Walker
High
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Bell
Low
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#651 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bell and the region

Centroid at 33.9674, -118.1537 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bell
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.2% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,823 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bell
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bell
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bell
8.4

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 533902Bell: 9.09.0Bellparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Set annual rent against average income of $57,803 and the ratio lands at 38%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10. SNAP participation runs 31.7% against 15.2% nationally.

This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Housing insecurity runs 30.5% against 14.2% nationally. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.4/10.

62% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037533902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037533902?

Census tract 06037533902 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037533902?

Median gross rent is $1,823/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037533902?

14.2% of residents in tract 06037533902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,454.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037533902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 34th, minority 98th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 06037533902 considered part of Walker?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037533902 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037533902 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037533902 compare to Bell overall?

Tract 06037533902 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bell

Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related