Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Walker Eviction Risk: High , Bell

Tract 06037534101 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,931 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

06037534101 is a census tract in the Walker area of Bell Gardens, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. 37% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 38% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units469
Renter share59.9%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$54,107

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 22 tracts In Walker
High
Within parent city
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 9 tracts In Bell
High
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#653 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bell and the region

Centroid at 33.9718, -118.1658 · click any tract to drill in

Why Walker scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bell
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,472 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bell
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bell
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bell
8.4

How Walker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Walker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 534101Bell: 9.09.0Bellparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Walker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Walker

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.

The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $54,107, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10.

Housing insecurity runs 27.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 24.2% against 11.3% nationally.

At $1,472 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Bell Gardens commands. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. 60% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037534101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037534101?

Census tract 06037534101 in the Walker neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037534101?

Median gross rent is $1,472/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037534101?

14.5% of residents in tract 06037534101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,931.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037534101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 38th, minority 98th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 06037534101 considered part of Walker?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037534101 fall within Walker (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037534101 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037534101 compare to Bell overall?

Tract 06037534101 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Bell at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bell; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Bell

Top eight tracts in Bell ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related