Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037211121 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,354 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 06037211121 covers part of the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 38%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 56% Stable renters 35% Owners 9%

Tract context

Occupied units1,002

Renter share91.3%

SVI overall0.93

Poverty rate21.9%

Median income$70,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0730, -118.2854 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

21.9% poverty · this tract

5.5

Supply constraint

$2,039 rent vs county FMR

2.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Little Bangladesh compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

95%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
89%Racial/ethnic minority
90%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
47%Grade C
53%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

19.2%Housing insecurity
8.7%Utility-shutoff threat
24.8%Food insecurity
22.1%SNAP enrollment
12.0%Transit barriers
12.2%No health insurance
17.2%Frequent mental distress
30.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. This is renter territory: 91% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $70,167 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened. The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Food insecurity runs 24.8% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.4/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037211121

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037211121?

Census tract 06037211121 in the Little Bangladesh neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037211121?

Median gross rent is $2,039/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037211121?

21.9% of residents in tract 06037211121 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,354.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037211121?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 59th, minority 89th, housing 90th.

Is tract 06037211121 considered part of Little Bangladesh?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037211121 fall within Little Bangladesh (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037211121 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037211121 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037211121 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037211121 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 53% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.