Van Ness Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037234600 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,885 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 06037234600 covers part of the Van Ness area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. 60% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9920, -118.3276 · click any tract to drill in
Why Van Ness scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Van Ness compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 69%Grade B
- 31%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Van Ness. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.5%Housing insecurity
- 12.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 28.4%Food insecurity
- 28.5%SNAP enrollment
- 14.2%Transit barriers
- 11.8%No health insurance
- 18.9%Frequent mental distress
- 36.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Van Ness
81% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $67,882 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Food insecurity runs 28.4% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 24.5% against 14.2% nationally.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037234600
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037234600?
What is the average rent in tract 06037234600?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037234600?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037234600?
Is tract 06037234600 considered part of Van Ness?
What share of households in tract 06037234600 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037234600 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037234600 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.