Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Washington Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037185102 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,542 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 06037185102 sits in the Mount Washington eviction laws area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.4/10. about three-quarters of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

Risk score

8.4

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 6% Owners 77%

Tract context

Occupied units1,443

Renter share23.6%

SVI overall0.23

Poverty rate8.7%

Median income$135,506

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1062, -118.2128 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Washington scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

8.7% poverty · this tract

2.2

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

8.3

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Mount Washington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

29%Socioeconomic
8%Household composition
57%Racial/ethnic minority
37%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
74%Grade B
1%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Washington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.8%Housing insecurity
4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
9.2%Food insecurity
7.9%SNAP enrollment
5.3%Transit barriers
5.3%No health insurance
13.1%Frequent mental distress
23.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Washington

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Average gross rent is $3,501, 81% above the Los Angeles average. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 7.9% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 24% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037185102

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037185102?

Census tract 06037185102 in the Mount Washington neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037185102?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 74% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037185102?

8.7% of residents in tract 06037185102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,542.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037185102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 8th, minority 57th, housing 37th.

Is tract 06037185102 considered part of Mount Washington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037185102 fall within Mount Washington (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037185102 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037185102 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037185102 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037185102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.