Within neighborhood
11
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally
Raymer Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037120300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,299 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Census tract 06037120300 covers part of the Raymer area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,299. Severe burden reaches 48%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,530
Renter share39.4%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate17.3%
Median income$56,364
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
97
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.2153, -118.4408 · click any tract to drill in
Why Raymer scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.3% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$1,477 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Raymer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 72%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 70%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Raymer. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.1%Housing insecurity
- 9.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.6%Food insecurity
- 25.1%SNAP enrollment
- 12.9%Transit barriers
- 14.5%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Raymer
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 70% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Average gross rent is $1,477, 24% below the Los Angeles average.
SNAP participation runs 25.1% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 27.6% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $56,364. 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037120300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037120300?
Census tract 06037120300 in the Raymer neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037120300?
Median gross rent is $1,477/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037120300?
17.3% of residents in tract 06037120300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,299.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037120300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 72th, minority 85th, housing 70th.
Q5
Is tract 06037120300 considered part of Raymer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037120300 fall within Raymer (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037120300 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037120300 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037120300 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Bicycle District
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
City Terrace
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Westlake South
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Park La Brea
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Harvard Heights
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Chesterfield Square
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Vermont Knolls
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Tujunga
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related