Tract 06037127712 ·
Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,859 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 06037127712 covers part of the Raymer area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,859 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52%Stable renters 33%Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,566
Renter share84.9%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate22.5%
Median income$64,239
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
83th percentile
#4 of 19 tracts In Raymer
High
Within parent city
46th percentile
#609 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
95th percentile
#129 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100th percentile
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1974, -118.4701 · click any tract to drill in
Why Raymer scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.5% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,695 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Raymer compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.1%Housing insecurity
9.7%Utility-shutoff threat
24.8%Food insecurity
22.8%SNAP enrollment
12.2%Transit barriers
14.0%No health insurance
18.1%Frequent mental distress
32.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Raymer
The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 85% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
The poverty rate is 23%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. SNAP participation runs 22.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 24.8% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,695, 12% below the Los Angeles average. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037127712
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037127712?
Census tract 06037127712 in the Raymer neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037127712?
Median gross rent is $1,695/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037127712?
22.5% of residents in tract 06037127712 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,859.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037127712?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 43th, minority 83th, housing 99th.
Q5
Is tract 06037127712 considered part of Raymer?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037127712 fall within Raymer (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037127712 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037127712 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037127712 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.