Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037221820 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,335 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 06037221820 covers part of the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,335 residents. The severe-burden share is 42%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0305, -118.2865 · click any tract to drill in
Why Saint James Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Saint James Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 87%Grade C
- 12%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.2%Housing insecurity
- 9.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.2%Food insecurity
- 26.0%SNAP enrollment
- 15.9%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 22.5%Frequent mental distress
- 31.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park
Annualized rent equals 85% of average household income of $26,236, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
The poverty rate is 52%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, economic stress reads 10/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 68% of renters here are cost-burdened.
92% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.
SNAP participation runs 26.0% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 27.2% against 17.8% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.7/10.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037221820
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037221820?
What is the average rent in tract 06037221820?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037221820?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037221820?
Is tract 06037221820 considered part of Saint James Park?
What share of households in tract 06037221820 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037221820 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037221820 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.