Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037231100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,809 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
06037231100 is a census tract in the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,809. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0152, -118.2766 · click any tract to drill in
Why Saint James Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Saint James Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 100%Socioeconomic
- 76%Household composition
- 91%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 40.2%Housing insecurity
- 22.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 52.5%Food insecurity
- 54.5%SNAP enrollment
- 26.1%Transit barriers
- 28.4%No health insurance
- 22.8%Frequent mental distress
- 48.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park
Food insecurity runs 52.5% against 17.8% nationally. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 9.6/10.
89% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 39%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,294, 33% below the Los Angeles average.
Set annual rent against average income of $46,806 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Disability prevalence runs 48.0% against 31.5% nationally.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037231100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037231100?
What is the average rent in tract 06037231100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037231100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037231100?
Is tract 06037231100 considered part of Saint James Park?
What share of households in tract 06037231100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037231100 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037231100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.