Skip to content
East Pasadena, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 5,479 residents

East Pasadena, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Los Angeles County · Population 5,479

In 2026
Risk score
7.8
HIGH

48th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.5 Now7.8
9.1 2.5 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.7 1993 · score 3.8 1994 · score 3.8 1995 · score 3.6 1996 · score 3.6 1997 · score 3.6 1998 · score 3.7 1999 · score 3.7 2000 · score 3.7 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 4.0 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.0 2007 · score 4.1 2008 · score 4.9 2009 · score 5.1 2010 · score 5.2 2011 · score 5.3 2012 · score 5.4 2013 · score 5.4 2014 · score 5.4 2015 · score 5.4 2016 · score 5.7 2017 · score 5.9 2018 · score 6.0 2019 · score 6.8 2020 · score 9.1 2021 · score 8.8 2022 · score 8.3 2023 · score 8.0 2024 · score 8.1 2025 · score 7.9 2026 · score 7.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.5 Regional 7.5 State 6.8 Economic 3.9 Supply 7.7 Rent Control 8.5 Eviction 6.6 Tenant 6.0 Housing 6.1 7.8 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +32.9% (2024)
    7.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.5
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    6.4% poverty · 2.2% unemp.
    3.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,229 average · 27.6% renters
    7.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    46.1% of income on rent
    8.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    249 days filing → judgment
    6.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    27.6% renters
    6.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Pasadena and the region

Click any city to see its score

How East Pasadena compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Los Angeles County
Very Low
#132 of 144 cities
Rank in county, 8th percentileLowHigh
#132 of 144 cities in Los Angeles County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Moderate
#856 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 46th percentileLowHigh
#856 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
East Pasadena risk score vs. county / state / U.S.East Pasadena: 7.87.8East PasadenaThis cityCounty: 9.09.0Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.8
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.8/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 249d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,229/mo. A contested eviction takes 249 days and costs $15,814–$37,388 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 27.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 5,479 residents, 27.6% rent. 46% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 6.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.5 and 7.5 (Dem margin +32.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.6, housing court bias 6.1, rent-control risk 8.5. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.9. Supply constraint: 7.7. The numbers behind those: 6.4% poverty, 2.2% unemployment, 46% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

East Pasadena sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.9 Los Angeles Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 9.6 Long Beach Anaheim, CA · 258d · ~$23.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 8 Anaheim Riverside, CA · 245d · ~$21.8k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.8 Riverside Santa Ana, CA · 282d · ~$25.2k all-in ($90/day) · score 9 Santa Ana Irvine, CA · 274d · ~$24.7k all-in ($90/day) · score 7.8 Irvine Santa Clarita, CA · 249d · ~$22.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 8.1 Santa Clarita San Bernardino, CA · 294d · ~$24.6k all-in ($84/day) · score 8.1 San Bernardino Fontana, CA · 257d · ~$26.7k all-in ($104/day) · score 7.8 Fontana Huntington Beach, CA · 291d · ~$23.0k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.8 Huntington Beach Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle East Pasadena
East Pasadena · 249d · ~$26.6k all-in ($107/day) · score 7.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in East Pasadena, CA

Landlording in East Pasadena, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.8/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

East Pasadena is a city of 5,479 residents where 27.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 46.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,229/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How East Pasadena eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in East Pasadena closes 249 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of East Pasadena's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in East Pasadena runs $15,814 to $37,388 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 249 days of typical timeline and $2,229/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6/10 in East Pasadena, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in East Pasadena: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $37,388 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in East Pasadena

Trap · 8.5/10
The 5.9/10 score weighs nine sub-factors including political climate, court bias, supply constraint, and tenant organizing strength. East Pasadena's rent-control-risk sub-score is 8.5/10, driven by demographic and political pressure for tenant relief.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the biggest risk for landlords in East Pasadena?

The biggest risk is the combination of high eviction costs (averaging $15,814, $37,388) and extremely long timelines (249 days). This means significant lost rent and legal fees if an eviction becomes necessary. California's just-cause requirements also add complexity.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant in East Pasadena if I want to move into my property?

Yes, owner move-in is generally a "no-fault" just cause for eviction in California, including East Pasadena. However, you will likely be required to pay relocation assistance to the tenant. The exact amount can vary, so consult with an attorney.
Q3

Is rent control a factor for my property in East Pasadena?

Yes, California's Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (AB 1482) imposes statewide rent caps and just-cause eviction requirements for many properties. While East Pasadena itself doesn't have a separate local rent control ordinance, AB 1482 applies. Check if your property is exempt, though most aren't. Read more at California rent control rules.
Q4

What should I do if my tenant claims they can't pay due to a job loss?

While empathy is important, you must follow the legal process. Serve the 3-day pay-or-quit notice. You can offer a payment plan or discuss "cash for keys" as an alternative to eviction, but do not waive your right to pursue eviction if an agreement isn't reached or kept. Document everything.
Q5

How strict are the security deposit return rules in California?

Very strict. You have 21 days from when the tenant vacates to return the full deposit or an itemized statement of deductions. Missing this deadline can result in you owing the tenant the full deposit, plus potential penalties. Keep meticulous records of any damage.
Q6

Do I really need an attorney for an eviction in East Pasadena?

Given the complexity of California law, the just-cause requirements, and the high costs/long timelines in East Pasadena, hiring an attorney for an eviction is highly recommended. Mistakes can be very costly and delay the process significantly.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.8/10 places East Pasadena in the 48th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.