Skip to content
Glendale, California eviction risk overview
Ranked #781 of 1,865 nationally

Glendale, CA Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Los Angeles County · Population 190,748

In 2026
Risk score
5.4
MODERATE

25th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average4.3 Now5.4
10 5 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.0 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.1 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.3 1994 · score 3.4 1995 · score 3.3 1996 · score 3.4 1997 · score 3.5 1998 · score 3.6 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.8 2001 · score 3.9 2002 · score 4.1 2003 · score 4.1 2004 · score 4.1 2005 · score 4.2 2006 · score 4.3 2007 · score 4.4 2008 · score 5.1 2009 · score 5.3 2010 · score 5.4 2011 · score 5.5 2012 · score 5.6 2013 · score 5.7 2014 · score 5.8 2015 · score 6.0 2016 · score 6.5 2017 · score 6.7 2018 · score 7.0 2019 · score 7.4 2020 · score 8.3 2021 · score 8.4 2022 · score 8.3 2023 · score 8.4 2024 · score 8.1 2025 · score 6.6 2026 · score 5.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.5 Regional 7.5 State 6.8 Economic 7.3 Supply 9.6 Rent Control 9.0 Eviction 6.1 Tenant 9.7 Housing 7.7 5.4 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +32.9% (2024)
    7.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.5
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    13.4% poverty · 8.2% unemp.
    7.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,182 average · 64.8% renters
    9.6
  6. Rent Control risk
    37.8% of income on rent
    9.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    255 days filing → judgment
    6.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    64.8% renters
    9.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glendale and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Glendale compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Los Angeles County
Very Low
#139 of 144 cities
Rank in county, 4th percentileBottomTop
#139 of 144 cities in Los Angeles County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Low
#1228 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileBottomTop
#1228 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Glendale risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Glendale: 5.45.4GlendaleThis cityCounty: 8.38.3Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.4
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 5.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 255d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,182/mo. A contested eviction takes 255 days and costs $13,368-$39,234 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 64.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 190,748 residents, 64.8% rent. 38% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.5 and 7.5 (Dem margin +32.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.1, housing court bias 7.7, rent-control risk 9. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.3. Supply constraint: 9.6. The numbers behind those: 13.4% poverty, 8.2% unemployment, 38% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Glendale sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 10 Los Angeles Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 7.5 Long Beach Anaheim, CA · 258d · ~$23.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 5.3 Anaheim Santa Ana, CA · 282d · ~$25.2k all-in ($90/day) · score 9.2 Santa Ana Irvine, CA · 274d · ~$24.7k all-in ($90/day) · score 5.1 Irvine Santa Clarita, CA · 249d · ~$22.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 6.5 Santa Clarita Fontana, CA · 257d · ~$26.7k all-in ($104/day) · score 8 Fontana Huntington Beach, CA · 291d · ~$23.0k all-in ($79/day) · score 5.2 Huntington Beach Ontario, CA · 279d · ~$26.2k all-in ($94/day) · score 7.3 Ontario Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 280d · ~$26.5k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.9 Rancho Cucamonga Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Glendale
Glendale · 255d · ~$26.3k all-in ($103/day) · score 5.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Glendale, CA

Landlording in Glendale, California, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.4/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Glendale is a city of 190,748 residents where 64.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 37.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,182/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Glendale eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Glendale closes 255 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Glendale's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Glendale runs $13,368 to $39,234 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 255 days of typical timeline and $2,182/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.7/10 in Glendale, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Glendale: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $39,234 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Glendale

Trap · GLENDALE RENT STABILIZATION DEPARTMENT
The Glendale RSO mechanics: 5 percent plus CPI cap, just-cause grounds enumerated at the municipal level, relocation assistance for no-fault terminations. The Glendale Rent Stabilization Department investigates compliance complaints. Findings against landlords can void terminations and require rollback of unauthorized rent increases.
Trap · AB 1482
State context: AB 1482 applies. Costa-Hawkins exempts pre-1995 condos and SFRs but not multifamily older than 15 years. The LA Superior Court Glendale Courthouse has been processing RSO compliance issues since 2020; cases that fail to identify the regulatory regime (RSO vs. AB 1482 vs. Costa-Hawkins exempt) get demurred.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Glendale for no reason?

No. California is a "just-cause" eviction state. You must have a legally recognized reason to evict a tenant, even if their lease term is ending. Reasons can include non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific "no-fault" reasons like an owner move-in or substantial renovation, which often require relocation assistance.
Q2

How long does it typically take to evict someone in Glendale?

The typical eviction timeline in Glendale is approximately 255 days. This is an average and can vary depending on whether the tenant contests the eviction, court backlogs, and any procedural errors.
Q3

What's the maximum security deposit I can charge in Glendale?

In Glendale, under California law, you can charge a maximum of one month's rent as a security deposit for an unfurnished unit. For a furnished unit, it's two months' rent.
Q4

Do I need an attorney to evict a tenant in Glendale?

While not legally required, it is highly recommended to hire an attorney for an eviction in Glendale. California's landlord-tenant laws are complex and unforgiving. Procedural errors can lead to significant delays and increased costs, making legal representation a wise investment.
Q5

Can I refuse to rent to someone who uses a Section 8 voucher in Glendale?

No, you cannot. California has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against applicants based on their lawful source of income, including housing assistance programs like Section 8.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.4/10 places Glendale in the 25th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.