Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Emerald Isle Eviction Risk: Elevated , Glendale

Tract 06037460700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,102 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Tract 06037460700 sits in the Emerald Isle area of Los Angeles County, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6/10. Population here is 5,102. 33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 7% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,476
Renter share10.5%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$196,471

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Emerald Isle
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Glendale
Very Low
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#2,251 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#7,047 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glendale and the region

Centroid at 34.1929, -118.1988 · click any tract to drill in

Why Emerald Isle scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glendale
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,468 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glendale
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glendale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glendale
5.0

How Emerald Isle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Emerald Isle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 460700Glendale: 9.19.1Glendaleparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Emerald Isle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Emerald Isle

It sits 2.4 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.2/10.

SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.3% against 11.3% nationally.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #18,163 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $196,471, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037460700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037460700?

Census tract 06037460700 in the Emerald Isle neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037460700?

Median gross rent is $2,468/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037460700?

6.3% of residents in tract 06037460700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,102.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037460700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 61th, minority 59th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 06037460700 considered part of Emerald Isle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037460700 fall within Emerald Isle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037460700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037460700 compare to Glendale overall?

Tract 06037460700 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Glendale at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037460700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Glendale

Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related