Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Emerald Isle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glendale

Tract 06037300800 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 7,172 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 06037300800 covers the Emerald Isle area of Glendale, home to 7,172 residents. For landlords it grades 6.2/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 82% of US census tracts.

58% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,304 a month while the average household earns $113,509 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

5.9

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 22% Owners 48%

Tract context

Occupied units2,705

Renter share51.6%

SVI overall0.72

Poverty rate3.4%

Median income$113,509

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Glendale and the region

Centroid at 34.1846, -118.2206 · click any tract to drill in

Why Emerald Isle scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Glendale

7.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

3.4% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$2,304 rent vs county FMR

3.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Glendale

9.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.1

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Glendale

9.7

Housing court bias

Inherited from Glendale

7.7

How Emerald Isle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

59%Socioeconomic
87%Household composition
60%Racial/ethnic minority
61%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
30%Grade B
7%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Emerald Isle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

8.3%Housing insecurity
3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
9.1%Food insecurity
8.0%SNAP enrollment
5.4%Transit barriers
4.4%No health insurance
14.4%Frequent mental distress
25.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Emerald Isle

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glendale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 72nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037300800

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037300800?

Census tract 06037300800 in the Emerald Isle neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037300800?

Median gross rent is $2,304/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037300800?

3.4% of residents in tract 06037300800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,172.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037300800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 87th, minority 60th, housing 61th.

Is tract 06037300800 considered part of Emerald Isle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037300800 fall within Emerald Isle (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037300800 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037300800 compare to Glendale overall?

Tract 06037300800 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of Glendale at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glendale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037300800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Glendale

Top eight tracts in Glendale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.