Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Bicycle District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037192610 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,958 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06037192610 covers part of the Bicycle District area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,958 residents. The severe-burden share is 46%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 67% Stable renters 29% Owners 4%

Tract context

Occupied units1,535

Renter share96.3%

SVI overall0.95

Poverty rate26.0%

Median income$48,558

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0814, -118.2962 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bicycle District scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

26.0% poverty · this tract

6.5

Supply constraint

$1,676 rent vs county FMR

1.4

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Bicycle District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

98%Socioeconomic
52%Household composition
88%Racial/ethnic minority
95%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
100%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bicycle District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

24.8%Housing insecurity
11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
32.0%Food insecurity
30.2%SNAP enrollment
15.3%Transit barriers
17.3%No health insurance
18.4%Frequent mental distress
36.6%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bicycle District

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. roughly two in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.

96% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 41% of average household income of $48,558, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. SNAP participation runs 30.2% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Housing insecurity runs 24.8% against 14.2% nationally.

Average gross rent is $1,676, 13% below the Los Angeles average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037192610

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037192610?

Census tract 06037192610 in the Bicycle District neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037192610?

Median gross rent is $1,676/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037192610?

26.0% of residents in tract 06037192610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,958.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037192610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 52th, minority 88th, housing 95th.

Is tract 06037192610 considered part of Bicycle District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037192610 fall within Bicycle District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037192610 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037192610 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037192610 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037192610 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.