Little Italy Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037296220 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,154 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037296220 in the Little Italy area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,154. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.7410, -118.2838 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Italy scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Italy compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 88%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 84%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Italy. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.4%Housing insecurity
- 12.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.2%Food insecurity
- 33.0%SNAP enrollment
- 16.3%Transit barriers
- 17.9%No health insurance
- 19.4%Frequent mental distress
- 40.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Italy
Average gross rent is $1,110, 43% below the Los Angeles average. 97% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. SNAP participation runs 33.0% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Housing insecurity runs 26.4% against 14.2% nationally.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037296220
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037296220?
What is the average rent in tract 06037296220?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037296220?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037296220?
Is tract 06037296220 considered part of Little Italy?
What share of households in tract 06037296220 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037296220 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037296220 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.