Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Garnsey Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037124500 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,695 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Tract 06037124500 sits in the Garnsey area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Population here is 2,695. Severe burden reaches 48%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 13% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share42.8%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate15.5%
Median income$77,635

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 16 tracts In Garnsey
High
Within parent city
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#242 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#106 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1723, -118.4268 · click any tract to drill in

Why Garnsey scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.5% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$2,198 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Garnsey compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Garnsey risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 124500Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Garnsey. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Garnsey

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Cost burden runs around two-thirds here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $77,635 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. At $2,198 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037124500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037124500?

Census tract 06037124500 in the Garnsey neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037124500?

Median gross rent is $2,198/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037124500?

15.5% of residents in tract 06037124500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,695.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037124500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 40th, minority 57th, housing 28th.
Q5

Is tract 06037124500 considered part of Garnsey?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037124500 fall within Garnsey (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037124500 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037124500 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037124500 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037124500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related