Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally
Twin Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Palm Springs
Tract 06065044805 · Riverside, CA · pop 1,628 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
06065044805 is a census tract in the Twin Palms area of Palm Springs, CA. It scores 6.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,628. The severe-burden share is 39%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units970
Renter share22.6%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$98,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
59
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Palm Springs and the region
Centroid at 33.8050, -116.5369 · click any tract to drill in
Why Twin Palms scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Palm Springs
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,452 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palm Springs
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palm Springs
7.6
How Twin Palms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Twin Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.5%Food insecurity
- 5.4%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 29.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Twin Palms
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.3/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.2/10.
Against Riverside County at 53.8%, 59% of renters here are cost-burdened. Housing insecurity runs 6.2% against 14.2% nationally.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally. Nationally it ranks #13,349 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10. Against average income of $98,000, annual rent is just 18%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Riverside County average of 6.6 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044805
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044805?
Census tract 06065044805 in the Twin Palms neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044805?
Median gross rent is $1,452/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044805?
8.9% of residents in tract 06065044805 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,628.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044805?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 22th, minority 39th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 06065044805 considered part of Twin Palms?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044805 fall within Twin Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06065044805 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06065044805 compare to Palm Springs overall?
Tract 06065044805 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Palm Springs at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palm Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Palm Springs
Top eight tracts in Palm Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Warm Sands
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06065044605
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06065941001
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
8.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Little Beverly Hills
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
Warm Sands
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
7.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
El Mirador
7.7
/ 10 · High
Related