Census Tract · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Carmichael Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06067007904 ·
Sacramento, CA · pop 5,893
Census tract 06067007904 covers part of Carmichael, CA, and scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%Stable renters 13%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,984
Renter share25.3%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$112,500
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
7th percentile
#15 of 16 tracts In Carmichael
Very Low
Within county
21th percentile
#288 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within state
16th percentile
#7,670 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
73th percentile
#22,681 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Carmichael and the region
Centroid at 38.6563, -121.3002 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carmichael scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carmichael
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,317 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carmichael
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carmichael
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carmichael
6.7
How Carmichael compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.0%Housing insecurity
5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
10.0%Food insecurity
9.8%SNAP enrollment
6.7%Transit barriers
5.8%No health insurance
17.2%Frequent mental distress
28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Carmichael
Average gross rent is $2,317, 36% above the Carmichael average. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10. It sits 1.5 points below the Sacramento County average of 7.1.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10. Food insecurity runs 10.0% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
47% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $112,500. 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067007904
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007904?
Census tract 06067007904 in Carmichael scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067007904?
Median gross rent is $2,317/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007904?
5.5% of residents in tract 06067007904 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,893.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007904?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 76th, minority 52th, housing 25th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067007904 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067007904 compare to Carmichael overall?
Tract 06067007904 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Carmichael at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carmichael; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Carmichael
Top eight tracts in Carmichael ranked by composite eviction-risk score.