With a score of 7.8/10, tract 06067008133 in Carmichael, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.
Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35%Stable renters 25%Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units1,122
Renter share60.6%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate14.0%
Median income$60,377
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
87th percentile
#3 of 16 tracts In Carmichael
High
Within county
63th percentile
#134 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Elevated
Within state
57th percentile
#3,885 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
89th percentile
#9,043 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Carmichael and the region
Centroid at 38.6658, -121.3316 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carmichael scores 7.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carmichael
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.0% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,362 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carmichael
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carmichael
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carmichael
6.7
How Carmichael compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
16.2%Housing insecurity
9.6%Utility-shutoff threat
19.6%Food insecurity
21.9%SNAP enrollment
11.4%Transit barriers
9.4%No health insurance
20.8%Frequent mental distress
35.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Carmichael
Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.2/10.
59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Sacramento County average of 50.2%. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10.
Average gross rent is $1,362, 20% below the Carmichael average. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.7 points.
On the national scale it lands near the 89th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $60,377. 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008133
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008133?
Census tract 06067008133 in Carmichael scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008133?
Median gross rent is $1,362/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008133?
14.0% of residents in tract 06067008133 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,465.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008133?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 80th, minority 50th, housing 91th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067008133 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067008133 compare to Carmichael overall?
Tract 06067008133 scores 7.8/10, higher than the parent city of Carmichael at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carmichael; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Carmichael
Top eight tracts in Carmichael ranked by composite eviction-risk score.