Census Tract · Ranked #14,906 of 84,120 nationally
Carmichael Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06067008134 ·
Sacramento, CA · pop 5,215 · 54% of tract blocks fall in Carmichael
Census tract 06067008134 covers part of Carmichael, CA, and scores 6.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 36% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County.
Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 34%Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units2,101
Renter share53.1%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$92,013
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
47th percentile
#9 of 16 tracts In Carmichael
Moderate
Within county
39th percentile
#222 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within state
35th percentile
#5,947 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
82th percentile
#14,906 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Carmichael and the region
Centroid at 38.6727, -121.3180 · click any tract to drill in
Why Carmichael scores 6.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carmichael
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,735 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carmichael
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carmichael
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carmichael
6.7
How Carmichael compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.3%Housing insecurity
7.3%Utility-shutoff threat
13.9%Food insecurity
14.1%SNAP enrollment
8.8%Transit barriers
7.5%No health insurance
19.9%Frequent mental distress
30.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Carmichael
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9/10. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 2.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.8/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,735, close to the Carmichael average.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $92,013. 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008134
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008134?
Census tract 06067008134 in Carmichael scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067008134?
Median gross rent is $1,735/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008134?
9.6% of residents in tract 06067008134 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,215.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008134?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 76th, minority 43th, housing 86th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06067008134 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06067008134 compare to Carmichael overall?
Tract 06067008134 scores 6.6/10, lower than the parent city of Carmichael at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carmichael; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Carmichael
Top eight tracts in Carmichael ranked by composite eviction-risk score.