McKinley Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento
Tract 06067000200 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,694 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
With a score of 6.5/10, tract 06067000200 in the McKinley Village area of Sacramento, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,694 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.2/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5741, -121.4408 · click any tract to drill in
Why McKinley Village scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow McKinley Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 47%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 16%Grade B
- 55%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within McKinley Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.9%Housing insecurity
- 3.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.4%Food insecurity
- 6.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in McKinley Village
Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.
Cost burden runs 42% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,970, 11% above the Sacramento average.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #15,451 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.6/10.
Against average income of $138,580, annual rent is just 17%. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06067000200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067000200?
What is the average rent in tract 06067000200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067000200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067000200?
Is tract 06067000200 considered part of McKinley Village?
What share of households in tract 06067000200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067000200 compare to Sacramento overall?
Was tract 06067000200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.