Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Fairgrounds Eviction Risk: Elevated , Sacramento

Tract 06067001601 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,677 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06067001601 sits in the Fairgrounds area of Sacramento eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.6/10. Population here is 3,677. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 22% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,608
Renter share42.5%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate15.3%
Median income$112,105

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Fairgrounds
Very Low
Within parent city
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#95 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
Low
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#150 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Elevated
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#4,223 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5600, -121.4349 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairgrounds scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.3% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,840 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Fairgrounds compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairgrounds risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.67.6This tracttract 001601Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fairgrounds. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairgrounds

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8/10.

Food insecurity runs 9.1% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.2/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. about half of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

It tracks the Sacramento County average of 7.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,840, close to the Sacramento average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $112,105.

43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067001601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067001601?

Census tract 06067001601 in the Fairgrounds neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067001601?

Median gross rent is $1,840/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067001601?

15.3% of residents in tract 06067001601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,677.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067001601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 2th, minority 58th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 06067001601 considered part of Fairgrounds?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067001601 fall within Fairgrounds (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067001601 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067001601 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067001601 scores 7.6/10, lower than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067001601 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 31% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related