Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Fairgrounds Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento

Tract 06067001702 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,715 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 06067001702 covers part of the Fairgrounds area of Sacramento, CA, and scores 9.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 22% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,054
Renter share58.2%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate21.5%
Median income$70,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Fairgrounds
Very High
Within parent city
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 131 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sacramento and the region

Centroid at 38.5533, -121.4486 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairgrounds scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
21.5% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,399 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sacramento
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sacramento
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sacramento
8.0

How Fairgrounds compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairgrounds risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 001702Sacramento: 7.97.9Sacramentoparent cityCounty: 7.17.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fairgrounds. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairgrounds

It sits 2.2 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.3/10.

61% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Sacramento County average of 50.2%. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.

Average gross rent is $1,399, 21% below the Sacramento average. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067001702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067001702?

Census tract 06067001702 in the Fairgrounds neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067001702?

Median gross rent is $1,399/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067001702?

21.5% of residents in tract 06067001702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,715.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067001702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 73th, minority 41th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 06067001702 considered part of Fairgrounds?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067001702 fall within Fairgrounds (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06067001702 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06067001702 compare to Sacramento overall?

Tract 06067001702 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Sacramento at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sacramento eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06067001702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento

Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related