Fairgrounds Eviction Risk: High , Sacramento
Tract 06067002800 · Sacramento, CA · pop 3,339 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 06067002800 sits in the Fairgrounds area of Sacramento eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.3/10. 35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Sacramento and the region
Centroid at 38.5429, -121.4582 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairgrounds scores 9.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Fairgrounds compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 94
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 70%Household composition
- 82%Racial/ethnic minority
- 94%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 90%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fairgrounds. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.3%Housing insecurity
- 13.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.4%Food insecurity
- 29.4%SNAP enrollment
- 15.0%Transit barriers
- 13.9%No health insurance
- 21.0%Frequent mental distress
- 35.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Fairgrounds
Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.2 points. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened.
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 8.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. SNAP participation runs 29.4% against 15.2% nationally.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
At $1,485 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Sacramento commands. Housing insecurity runs 23.3% against 14.2% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Sacramento. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 96th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06067002800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067002800?
What is the average rent in tract 06067002800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067002800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067002800?
Is tract 06067002800 considered part of Fairgrounds?
What share of households in tract 06067002800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06067002800 compare to Sacramento overall?
Was tract 06067002800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Sacramento
Top eight tracts in Sacramento ranked by composite eviction-risk score.