Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally

Lifestyle Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fontana

Tract 06071003301 · San Bernardino, CA · pop 5,245 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.3/10 for census tract 06071003301 reflects conditions in the Lifestyle area of Fontana, California. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

48% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,284 monthly, set against $67,799 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 64% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 33% Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units1,479
Renter share64.0%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate13.9%
Median income$67,799

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 13 tracts In Lifestyle
Elevated
Within parent city
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 44 tracts In Fontana
High
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#256 of 466 tracts In San Bernardino
Moderate
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#4,697 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fontana and the region

Centroid at 34.0723, -117.4447 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lifestyle scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fontana
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.9% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,284 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fontana
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fontana
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fontana
6.1

How Lifestyle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lifestyle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 003301Fontana: 7.87.8Fontanaparent cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lifestyle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lifestyle

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fontana eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Bernardino County average of 6.5 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06071003301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06071003301?

Census tract 06071003301 in the Lifestyle neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06071003301?

Median gross rent is $1,284/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06071003301?

13.9% of residents in tract 06071003301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,245.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06071003301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 83th, minority 93th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 06071003301 considered part of Lifestyle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06071003301 fall within Lifestyle (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06071003301 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06071003301 compare to Fontana overall?

Tract 06071003301 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Fontana at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fontana eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fontana

Top eight tracts in Fontana ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related