Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Parkmerced Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075060400 · San Francisco, CA · pop 1,866 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 06075060400 covers part of the Parkmerced area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,866 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 34% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,026
Renter share72.3%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$100,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Parkmerced
Very Low
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#98 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Elevated
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#40 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7227, -122.4916 · click any tract to drill in

Why Parkmerced scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,304 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Parkmerced compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Parkmerced risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 0604009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Parkmerced. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Parkmerced

The severe-burden share is 34%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.

Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 53% of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Food insecurity runs 9.6% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.6% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075060400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075060400?

Census tract 06075060400 in the Parkmerced neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075060400?

Median gross rent is $2,304/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075060400?

8.2% of residents in tract 06075060400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,866.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075060400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 53th, minority 77th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 06075060400 considered part of Parkmerced?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075060400 fall within Parkmerced (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075060400 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075060400 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075060400 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075060400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related