Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally

Duboce Triangle Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075021100 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,959 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

06075021100 is a census tract in the Duboce Triangle area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 8.7/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,959. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 42% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units2,021
Renter share54.9%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$244,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 14 tracts In Duboce Triangle
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#241 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#236 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,258 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7540, -122.4298 · click any tract to drill in

Why Duboce Triangle scores 8.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Duboce Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Duboce Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.7This tracttract 0211009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 5

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Duboce Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Duboce Triangle

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Cost burden runs 24% here against 37.3% across San Francisco County. Severe burden reaches 10%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Housing insecurity runs 5.4% against 14.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.2% against 11.3% nationally.

Against the San Francisco County average of 9.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $244,813, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075021100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075021100?

Census tract 06075021100 in the Duboce Triangle neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075021100?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075021100?

2.5% of residents in tract 06075021100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,959.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075021100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 1th, minority 46th, housing 51th.
Q5

Is tract 06075021100 considered part of Duboce Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075021100 fall within Duboce Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075021100 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075021100 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075021100 scores 8.7/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075021100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related