Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally

Forest Hill Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075030400 · San Francisco, CA · pop 5,262 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 06075030400 covers part of the Forest Hill area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,262 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 10% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units2,193
Renter share15.6%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$140,524

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Forest Hill
Very High
Within parent city
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#215 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#216 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#2,111 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7470, -122.4675 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest Hill scores 8.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,573 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Forest Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.8This tracttract 0304009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Forest Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest Hill

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 5.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the San Francisco County average of 9.5, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.5/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075030400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075030400?

Census tract 06075030400 in the Forest Hill neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075030400?

Median gross rent is $2,573/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075030400?

3.8% of residents in tract 06075030400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,262.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075030400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 32th, minority 75th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 06075030400 considered part of Forest Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075030400 fall within Forest Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075030400 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075030400 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075030400 scores 8.8/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075030400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related