Lower Pacific Heights Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075013401 · San Francisco, CA · pop 1,370 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
06075013401 is a census tract in the Lower Pacific Heights area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 9.2/10 for landlords. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7902, -122.4383 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lower Pacific Heights scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Lower Pacific Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 1%Grade B
- 75%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lower Pacific Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.9%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.4%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Lower Pacific Heights
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 25% of renters here are cost-burdened.
This is renter territory: 75% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Disability prevalence runs 18.5% against 31.5% nationally. Food insecurity runs 5.9% against 17.8% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. At $2,848 a month, rents run 15% over what the rest of San Francisco commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075013401
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075013401?
What is the average rent in tract 06075013401?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075013401?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075013401?
Is tract 06075013401 considered part of Lower Pacific Heights?
What share of households in tract 06075013401 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075013401 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075013401 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.