Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,339 of 84,120 nationally

Russian Hill Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075010902 · San Francisco, CA · pop 2,502 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 9.7/10, tract 06075010902 in the Russian Hill area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,502. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.7
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 55% Owners 10%
Tract context
Occupied units1,452
Renter share90.2%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate12.2%
Median income$141,591

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Russian Hill
High
Within parent city
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#113 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Moderate
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#112 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Moderate
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,125 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7978, -122.4222 · click any tract to drill in

Why Russian Hill scores 9.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.2% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$3,049 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Russian Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Russian Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.7This tracttract 0109029.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Russian Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Russian Hill

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

This is renter territory: 90% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $3,049, 23% above the San Francisco average.

Food insecurity runs 9.7% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #2,339 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.7/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075010902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075010902?

Census tract 06075010902 in the Russian Hill neighborhood scores 9.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075010902?

Median gross rent is $3,049/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075010902?

12.2% of residents in tract 06075010902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,502.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075010902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 30th, minority 50th, housing 74th.
Q5

Is tract 06075010902 considered part of Russian Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075010902 fall within Russian Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075010902 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075010902 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075010902 scores 9.7/10, right in line with the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075010902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 18% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related