Seacliff Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075042800 · San Francisco, CA · pop 2,348 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 06075042800 covers part of the Seacliff area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 8.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,348 residents. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7880, -122.4886 · click any tract to drill in
Why Seacliff scores 8.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Seacliff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 67%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 88%Grade A
- 8%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Seacliff. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 2.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.3%Food insecurity
- 4.0%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 2.9%No health insurance
- 11.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Seacliff
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. At $3,292 a month, rents run 33% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.
SNAP participation runs 4.0% against 15.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 25% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $246,635, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075042800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075042800?
What is the average rent in tract 06075042800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075042800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075042800?
Is tract 06075042800 considered part of Seacliff?
What share of households in tract 06075042800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075042800 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075042800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.